Issue
Establishment of a cochlear injury model using bone-conducted ultrasound irradiation in guinea pigs and investigation on peripheral coding and recognition of ultrasonic signals
Corresponding Author(s) : Cheng Cao
Cellular and Molecular Biology,
Vol. 64 No. 12: Issue 12
Abstract
The cochlea of guinea pigs was irradiated with different frequencies of bone-conducted ultrasound (BCU) at a specific dose to induce cochlear hair cell-specific injuries, in order to establish frequency-related cochlear hair cell-specific injury models. Cochlear near-field potentials were then evoked using BCU of different frequencies and intensities to explore the peripheral coding and recognition of BCU by the cochlea. The inner ears of guinea pigs were irradiated by 30 kHz at 100 db and 80 kHz at100 db BCU for 6h to create frequency-related, ultrasound-specific cochlear injury models. Then, 30 kHz and 80 kHz BCU of different intensities were used to evoke auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds, compound action potential (CAP) thresholds, and action potential (AP) intensity-amplitude input-output curves in the normal control group and the ultrasonic cochlear injury group. This allowed us to explore the coding and recognition of BCU frequencies and intensities by cochlear hair cells. Immunofluorescence assay of outer hair cell (OHC) Prestin and inner hair cell (IHC) Otofelin was performed to verify the injury models. Irradiation of guinea pig inner ears by 30 kHz and 80 kHz BCU at a specific dose induced hair cell injuries at different sites. Irradiation with low frequency BCU mainly induced OHC injury, whereas irradiation with high frequency BCU induced IHC injury; moreover, IHC injury was more serious than OHC injury. The 30 kHz-evoked ABR threshold was significantly higher in the 30 kHz ultrasonic cochlear injury group compared to the normal control group. The 30 kHz-evoked ABR threshold was significantly higher in the 30 kHz ultrasonic cochlear injury group compared to the 80 kHz ultrasonic cochlear injury group. The difference in the 80 kHz-evoked ABR thresholds were not significant between the 30 kHz and 80 kHz ultrasonic cochlear injury groups. The click- and 30 kHz-evoked AP intensity-amplitude curves for the 30 kHz ultrasonic cochlear injury group indicate that the AP amplitude evoked at the same intensity was higher in the 30 kHz-evoked group than the click-evoked group. The spatial positions of cochlear hair cells in guinea pigs had a coding function for the frequencies of low-frequency ultrasound. OHCs have an amplification effect on the coding of low-frequency ultrasonic intensities. The peripheral perception of high frequency BCU may not require the participation of cochlear hair cells.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Koizumi T, Nishimura T, Yamashita A, Yamanaka T, Imamura T, Hosoi H. Residual inhibition of tinnitus induced by 30-kHz bone-conducted ultrasound.Hear Res.2014.01.011. [Epub ahead of print]
- Nishimura T, Okayasu T, Saito O.An examination of the effects of broadband air-conduction masker on the speech intelligibility of speech-modulated bone-conduction ultrasound.Hear Res. 2014 Nov;317:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
- Okayasu T, Nishimura T, Nakagawa S, Yamashita A, Nagatani Y, Uratani Y, Yamanaka T, Hosoi H. Evaluation of prosodic and segmental change in speech-modulated bone-conducted ultrasound by mismatch fields.Neurosci Lett. 2013.11.048.
- Fusen Wang, Jibao Wang, Shusheng Gong. A Study of the Histologic and Enzyme Histochemical Changes in the Cochlea of Guinea Pigs after Non-Focused Ultrasound Irradiation.Cell Biochem Biophys.2013,66:409-415.
- Okayasu T, Nishimura T, Yamashita A, Saito O, Fukuda F, Yanai S, Hosoi H. Human ultrasonichearing is induced by a direct ultrasonic stimulation of the cochlea.Neurosci Lett.2013.01.040. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
- Torbatian Z, Garland P, Adamson R, Savage J, Bance M, Brown J.Listening to the cochlea with high-frequency ultrasound.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Dec;38(12):2208-17
- Nishimura T, Okayasu T, Uratani Y.Peripheral perception of ultrasonic hearing. Hearing Research[doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.004]
- Lenhardt ML, Skellett R.,Wang P. Human UltrasonicSpeech Perception. Science . 1991,253:82-84.
- Ohyama,K.,Kusakari,J., Kawamoto, K. Ultrasonic electrochleography in guinea pig.Hearing Research .1985.17:143-151.
- Hiroaki Tsukano,Masao Hone,Tukeshi Bo.Delineation of a frequency-organized region isolated from the mouse primary auditory cortex.J Neurophycal.2015Apr,113(7),2900-2920.
- Christine V. Portfors,David J. Perkel.The role of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse communication.Curr Opin Neurobiol.2014oct,o:115-120.
- Allain-Thibeault Ferhat, Nicolas Torquet, Anne-Marie Le Sourd. Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication. J Vis Exp. 2016; (112): 53871.
- Jumpei Matsumoto, Hiroshi Nishimaru, Yusaku Takamura.Amygdalar Auditory Neurons Contribute to Self-Other Distinction during Ultrasonic Social Vocalization in Rats.Front Neurosci. 2016; 10: 399.
- Jose A. Garcia-Lazaro, Kathryn N. Shepard,Jason A. Miranda.An Overrepresentation of High Frequencies in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus Supports the Processing of Ultrasonic Vocalizations.PLoS One. 2015; 10(8): e0133251.
- Condon Lau, Jevin W. Zhang, Joe S. Cheng.Noninvasive fMRI Investigation of Interaural Level Difference Processing in the Rat Auditory Subcortex.PLoS One. 2013; 8(8): e70706.
References
Koizumi T, Nishimura T, Yamashita A, Yamanaka T, Imamura T, Hosoi H. Residual inhibition of tinnitus induced by 30-kHz bone-conducted ultrasound.Hear Res.2014.01.011. [Epub ahead of print]
Nishimura T, Okayasu T, Saito O.An examination of the effects of broadband air-conduction masker on the speech intelligibility of speech-modulated bone-conduction ultrasound.Hear Res. 2014 Nov;317:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
Okayasu T, Nishimura T, Nakagawa S, Yamashita A, Nagatani Y, Uratani Y, Yamanaka T, Hosoi H. Evaluation of prosodic and segmental change in speech-modulated bone-conducted ultrasound by mismatch fields.Neurosci Lett. 2013.11.048.
Fusen Wang, Jibao Wang, Shusheng Gong. A Study of the Histologic and Enzyme Histochemical Changes in the Cochlea of Guinea Pigs after Non-Focused Ultrasound Irradiation.Cell Biochem Biophys.2013,66:409-415.
Okayasu T, Nishimura T, Yamashita A, Saito O, Fukuda F, Yanai S, Hosoi H. Human ultrasonichearing is induced by a direct ultrasonic stimulation of the cochlea.Neurosci Lett.2013.01.040. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
Torbatian Z, Garland P, Adamson R, Savage J, Bance M, Brown J.Listening to the cochlea with high-frequency ultrasound.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Dec;38(12):2208-17
Nishimura T, Okayasu T, Uratani Y.Peripheral perception of ultrasonic hearing. Hearing Research[doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.004]
Lenhardt ML, Skellett R.,Wang P. Human UltrasonicSpeech Perception. Science . 1991,253:82-84.
Ohyama,K.,Kusakari,J., Kawamoto, K. Ultrasonic electrochleography in guinea pig.Hearing Research .1985.17:143-151.
Hiroaki Tsukano,Masao Hone,Tukeshi Bo.Delineation of a frequency-organized region isolated from the mouse primary auditory cortex.J Neurophycal.2015Apr,113(7),2900-2920.
Christine V. Portfors,David J. Perkel.The role of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse communication.Curr Opin Neurobiol.2014oct,o:115-120.
Allain-Thibeault Ferhat, Nicolas Torquet, Anne-Marie Le Sourd. Recording Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations to Evaluate Social Communication. J Vis Exp. 2016; (112): 53871.
Jumpei Matsumoto, Hiroshi Nishimaru, Yusaku Takamura.Amygdalar Auditory Neurons Contribute to Self-Other Distinction during Ultrasonic Social Vocalization in Rats.Front Neurosci. 2016; 10: 399.
Jose A. Garcia-Lazaro, Kathryn N. Shepard,Jason A. Miranda.An Overrepresentation of High Frequencies in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus Supports the Processing of Ultrasonic Vocalizations.PLoS One. 2015; 10(8): e0133251.
Condon Lau, Jevin W. Zhang, Joe S. Cheng.Noninvasive fMRI Investigation of Interaural Level Difference Processing in the Rat Auditory Subcortex.PLoS One. 2013; 8(8): e70706.