Issue

Vol. 63 No. 10: Issue 10

The undersigned hereby assign all rights, included but not limited to copyright, for this manuscript to CMB Association upon its submission for consideration to publication on Cellular and Molecular Biology. The rights assigned include, but are not limited to, the sole and exclusive rights to license, sell, subsequently assign, derive, distribute, display and reproduce this manuscript, in whole or in part, in any format, electronic or otherwise, including those in existence at the time this agreement was signed. The authors hereby warrant that they have not granted or assigned, and shall not grant or assign, the aforementioned rights to any other person, firm, organization, or other entity. All rights are automatically restored to authors if this manuscript is not accepted for publication.

Induced dedifferentiation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) embryonic cells and its relationship with agronomic traits

https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2017.63.10.3
R. Naseri
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
K. Cheghamirza
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
L. Zarei
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
E. Saroei
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Corresponding Author(s) : K. Cheghamirza

cheghamirza@yandex.ru

Cellular and Molecular Biology, Vol. 63 No. 10: Issue 10

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the response of 42 Iranian and European barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars to induced dedifferentiation of embryonic cells via immature embryo culture and understand the relationship between embryo culture characters and agronomic traits. The cultivars were evaluated for dedifferentiation of embryonic cells or callus induction from immature embryo culture based on a completely randomized design with unequal replication. Immature embryos were placed scutellum down on cell dedifferentiation medium based on MS and supplemented with 2.5 mg/l 2,4-D. The developed calli were transferred to MS regeneration medium with different concentrations and combinations of plant growth regulators. The results of group comparisons showed that Iranian cultivars were greater than European cultivars regarding callus growth rate, callus primary diameter and total regenerated plantlets. The path correlation analysis revealed that grain width and kernel filling period had the highest positive and negative direct effects on embryo culture traits, respectively. Clustering cultivars based on the embryo culture characters and agronomic traits divided the cultivars into three groups. The third group consisted of the cultivars which all of them were with the highest mean for flag leaf length, days to anthesis, grain yield, callus growth rate and callus primary diameter. Mantel test revealed a negative (-0.101) and significant correlation (P<0.01) between embryo culture characters and agronomic traits. The significant relationships between few numbers of embryo culture characters and agronomic traits confirm that these characteristics could be genetically dependent and also tissue culture characters can be estimated from agronomic data.

Keywords

Cell dedifferentiation Hordeum vulgare L. Embryo culture Path analysis Plantlet regeneration.
Naseri, R., Cheghamirza, K., Zarei, L., & Saroei, E. (2017). Induced dedifferentiation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) embryonic cells and its relationship with agronomic traits. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 63(10), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2017.63.10.3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Abdallah HAL, Said AGE, Khalafalla MM. Establishment of an efficient callus induction and plant regeneration system in some wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grown in Sudan. Afr J Biotechnol 2012; 11: 3793-3799.
  3. AL Ajlouni Z, Ajlouni M, Shatnawi M, Shibli R, Makhdmeh I, Abu-Romman S, et al. Callus induction plant regeneration and growth on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). South-west J Hortic Biol Environ 2012; 3: 25-39.
  4. Arzani A, Mirodjagh SSh. Response of durum wheat cultivars to immature embryo culture, callus induction and in vitro salt stress. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 1999; 58: 67–72.
  5. Birsin M, Ozgen M. A comparison of callus induction and plant regeneration from different embryo explants of triticale (x triticosecale wittmack). Cell Mol Biol 2004; 9: 353-36.
  7. Bregitzer PD, Leen LS, Campbell RD. Enhancement of plant regeneration from embryogenic callus of commercial barley cultures. Plant. Cell. Rep 1998; 17: 941-945.
  9. Burun B, Cobanpoyazoglu E. Embryo culture in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Turk J Biol 2002; 26: 175-180.
  10. Castillo AM, Egana B, Sanz JM, Cistue L. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from barley cultivars grown in Spain. Plant. Cell. Rep 1998; 17: 902–906.
  11. Chang Yaww, Zitzewitz J, Hayes PM, Chen THH. High frequency plant regeneration form immature embryos of elite barley cultivars (Horedum vulgare L. cv. Morex). Plant. Cell. Rep 2003; 21: 733–738.
  12. Chauhan M, Kothari SL. Optimization of nutrient levels in the medium increase the effeciency of callus induction and plant regeneration in recalcitrant Indian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev B 2004; 40: 520-527.
  13. Dahleen LS, Bregitzer P. An improved media system for high regeneration rates from barley immature embryo-derived callus cultures of commercial cultivars. Crop Sci 2002; 42: 934–938.
  14. Dodig d, Zoric M, Mitic N, Nikolic R, Surlan-Momirovi G. Tissue culture and agronomic traits relationship in wheat. Plant Cell, Tiss Org 2008; 95:107–114.
  15. Ebtissam H, Hussein A, MagdyMadkour A, ShireenAssem K, Radwan AlZMA. Embryogenic callus formation and plant regeneration from immature embryos of some barley genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.). Arab J Biotechnol 2003; 7: 111-122.
  16. Emre B, Sibel Y, Halide H, Gonul K, Nermin G. Nikita retrotransposon movements in callus cultures of barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Plant Omics J 2012; 5: 211-215.
  17. Gadekar P, Dhumale DB, Rust RS. Interrelationship between yield and its components in rice bean (Vigna umbellata). Indian J Agr Sci 1990; 60: 571-590.
  18. Ganeshan S, Båga M, Harwey BL, Rossnagel BG, Scoles GJ, Chibbar RN. Production of multiple shoots from thiadiazuron-treated mature embryos and leaf-base/apical meristems of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Plant Cell, Tiss Org 2003; 73: 57–64.
  19. Ghasempour HR, Zebarjadi AR, Borjian L. Molecular aspects of drought tolerance in five genotypes of Brassica napus, evaluated with callus cultures under stress. XVI Congress of the Federation of European Societies of Plant Biology 2008; 105-108.
  20. Gubisova M, Mihalik D, Gubis J. Optimization of barley matures embryo regeneration and comparison with immature embryos of local cultivars. Nova Biotechnol et Chimica 2012; 11: 57- 62.
  21. Gurel F, Karakas O, Albayrak G, Ari S. Regeneration capacity of mature embryo-derived callus in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Acta Biol Hung 2009; 60: 309–319.
  22. Haliloglu K, Ozturk A, Tosun M, Bulut S. Relationship between tissue culture and agronomic traits of winter wheat. Cereal Res Commun 2005; 33: 469–476.
  23. Han Y, JIN XI, WU FB, Zhang GP. Genotypic differences in callus induction and plant regeneration from mature embryos of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Biomedicine & Biotechnol 2011; 12: 399-407.
  24. Harwood WA, Ross SM, Cilento P, Snape JW. The effect of DNA/gold particle preparation technique and particle bombardment device, on the transformation of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Euphytica 2000; 111: 67-76.
  25. Hess JR, Carman JG. Embryogenic competence of immature wheat embryos: genotype, donor plant, environment and endogenous hormones levels. Crop Sci 1998; 38: 249-253.
  26. Işikalan í‡, Akbaş FA, Tikat SE, Başaran D. In vitro micropropagation of almond (Amygdalus communis L. Cv. Nonpareil). Afr J Biotechnol 2008; 7: 1878-1880.
  27. Karp A, Steele SH, Parmar S, Jones MGK, Shewry PR, Breiman A. Relative stability among barley plants regenerated from cultured immature embryos. Genome 1987; 29: 405–412.
  28. Li W, Ding CH, Hu Z, Lu W, Guo GQ. Relationship between tissue culture and agronomic traits of spring wheat. Plant Sci 2003; 164: 1079–1085.
  29. Mantel, N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 1967; 27: 209-220.
  30. Mohtashami, R. The Correlation Study of important Barley agronomic traits and grain yield by Path Analysis. Biological Forum 2015; 7: 1211-1219.
  31. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 1962; 15:473–497.
  32. Norstog K. Induction of embryolike structures by kinetin in cultures barley embryos. Dev Biol 1970; 23: 665-670.
  33. Ozgen M, Tuert M, Altinok S, Sarak C. Efficient callus induction and plant regeneration through callus initiation from thin mature embryo culture of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Plant Cell, Tiss Org 1998; 18: 331-335.
  34. Senarath WTPSK. High frequency plant regeneration from immature embryos of an elite barley cultivar (Hordeum vulgare L cv Baegdong). J Natl Sci Found of Sri 2007; 35: 161-165.
  35. Serhantová V, Ehrenbergerová J, Ohnoutková L. Callus induction and regeneration efficiency of spring barley cultivars registered in the Czech Republic. Plant, Soil Environ 2004; 50: 456-462.
  36. Shatnawi MA, Shibli RA, Abu-Romman SM, Al-Mazra'awi MS, Al Ajlouni ZI, Shatanawi WA, et al. Clonal propagation and cryogenic storage of the medicinal plant Stevia rebaudiana. Span J of Agric Res 2011; 9: 213-220.
  37. Shatnawi MA. Micropropagation and germplasm storage of Prunus amygdalus by the vitrification method. Jordan J Agri Sci 2006; 2: 222-233.
  38. Rostami H, Giri A, Mozaffari AS, NejadMoslem A. Optimization of multiple shoot induction and plant regeneration in Indian barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars using mature embryos. Saudi J Biological Sci 2013; 20: 251–255.
  39. Tingay S, McElroy D, Kalla R, Fieg S, Wang M, Thornton S, et al. Agrobacterium tumefaciens- mediated barley transformation. Plant J 1997; 11: 1369–1376.
  40. Ward JHJr. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. J AM Stat Assoc 1963; 58: 236–244.
  41. Ward KA, Jordan MC. Callus formation and plant regeneration from immature and mature embryos of rye (Secale cereale L.). In Vitro Cell Dev B 2001; 37: 361-268.
  42. Weeks JT, Anderson OD, Blechl AE. Rapid production of multiple independent lines of fertile transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Physiol 1993; 102: 1077-084.
  43. Yadav T, Kachhwaha S, Kothari SL. Efficient in vitro plant regeneration and generation of transgenic plant in barley (Hordeum vulgar L.) using particle bombardment. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 2013; 22: 202-213.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 772 Download : 356