Issue

Vol. 65 No. 4: Issue 4

The undersigned hereby assign all rights, included but not limited to copyright, for this manuscript to CMB Association upon its submission for consideration to publication on Cellular and Molecular Biology. The rights assigned include, but are not limited to, the sole and exclusive rights to license, sell, subsequently assign, derive, distribute, display and reproduce this manuscript, in whole or in part, in any format, electronic or otherwise, including those in existence at the time this agreement was signed. The authors hereby warrant that they have not granted or assigned, and shall not grant or assign, the aforementioned rights to any other person, firm, organization, or other entity. All rights are automatically restored to authors if this manuscript is not accepted for publication.

Humic acid reduces the CuO and ZnO nanoparticles cellular toxicity in rapeseed (Brassica napus)

https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2019.65.4.5
Afsaneh Yarmohammadi
Former Student of Agroecology, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Mahmud Khoramivafa
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Saeid Jalali Honarmand
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Corresponding Author(s) : Mahmud Khoramivafa

khoramivafa@razi.ac.ir

Cellular and Molecular Biology, Vol. 65 No. 4: Issue 4

Abstract

Concerns about nanoparticles environmental pollution risk have been increased globally due to an increase in the production of nanoparticles in recent years and their use in diverse cases. The purpose of this experiment was to study the alleviation effect of humic acid on nanoparticles toxicity in greenhouse conditions. Thus two separate experiments were conducted at the rosette growing stages of rapeseed in a factorial experiment as a completely randomized design with three replications. The first factor was copper and zinc oxide nanoparticle in five concentrations of 0, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 mg.L-1 in each of experiments and the second factor was humic acid in two concentrations of 0 and 100 mg.L-1 in both experiments. The results showed that simultaneously application of humic acid and the nanoparticles resulted in increasing of chlorophyll, protein contents, and antioxidants enzymes activity. For example, the maximum activity of catalase was 170.72 and 296.82 µmol.min-1.mg-1 proteins when CuO nanoparticle was utilized alone and together with humic acid respectively. Also increasing the concentration of CuO nanoparticle reduced protein content from 2.44 to 1.88 (mg.gr-1 Fresh leaf weight), while its range was 2.86 and 2.49 (mg.gr-1 Fresh leaf weight) when adding the humic acid. Transmission electron microscopy images of root tissue confirm the decreasing of nanoparticles entrance to plant cell and tissue by humic acid. In general, application of humic acid alleviated the nanoparticles toxicity, due to the high adsorption capacity that is able to get out the metals from plants or like-hormonal activity probably.

Keywords

Environmental pollution Oilseed Organic matter Like-hormonal activity.
Yarmohammadi, A., Khoramivafa, M., & Honarmand, S. J. (2019). Humic acid reduces the CuO and ZnO nanoparticles cellular toxicity in rapeseed (Brassica napus). Cellular and Molecular Biology, 65(4), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2019.65.4.5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Gottschalk F, Lassen C, Kjoelholt J, Christensen F, Nowack B. Modeling flows and concentrations of nine engineered nanomaterials in the Danish environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015,12(5):5581-5602.
  2. Parveen A, Rizvi S, Gupta A, Singh R, Ahmad I, Mahdi F, et al. NMR-based metabonomics study of sub-acute hepatotoxicity induced by silica nanoparticles in rats after intranasal exposure. Cell Mol Biol 2012,58(1):196-203.
  3. Bondarenko O, Juganson K, Ivask A, Kasemets K, Mortimer M, Kahru A. Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review. Arch Toxicol 2013,87(7):1181-1200.
  4. Vicario-Parés U, Castañaga L, Lacave JM, Oron M, Reip P, Berhanu D, et al. Comparative toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO, ZnO and TiO 2) to developing zebrafish embryos. J Nanopart Res 2014,16(8):2550.
  5. Hernandez-Viezcas J, Castillo-Michel H, Servin A, Peralta-Videa J, Gardea-Torresdey J. Spectroscopic verification of zinc absorption and distribution in the desert plant Prosopis juliflora-velutina (velvet mesquite) treated with ZnO nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 2011,170(2):346-352.
  6. Nikbakht A, Kafi M, Babalar M, Xia YP, Luo A, Etemadi N-a. Effect of humic acid on plant growth, nutrient uptake, and postharvest life of gerbera. J Plant Nutr 2008,31(12):2155-2167.
  7. El-Hak SG, Ahmed A, Moustafa YJJHSOP. Effect of foliar application with two antioxidants and humic acid on growth, yield and yield components of peas (Pisum sativum L.). J Hortic Scie Ornam Plant 2012,4(3):318-328.
  8. Wang H, Ye Y, Qi J, Li F, Tang Y. Removal of titanium dioxide nanoparticles by coagulation: effects of coagulants, typical ions, alkalinity and natural organic matters. Wat SciTech 2013,68(5):1137-1143.
  9. Schwabe F, Schulin R, Limbach LK, Stark W, Bürge D, Nowack B. Influence of two types of organic matter on interaction of CeO2 nanoparticles with plants in hydroponic culture. Chemosphere 2013,91(4):512-520.
  10. Zhang X, Schmidt R. Hormone-containing products' impact on antioxidant status of tall fescue and creeping bentgrass subjected to drought. Crop Sci 2000,40(5):1344-1349.
  11. Ma X, Geiser-Lee J, Deng Y, Kolmakov A. Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. SciTotal Environ 2010,408(16):3053-3061.
  12. Ashraf M, McNeilly T. Salinity tolerance in Brassica oilseeds. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2004,23(2):157-174.
  13. Zaier H, Ghnaya T, Rejeb KB, Lakhdar A, Rejeb S, Jemal F. Effects of EDTA on phytoextraction of heavy metals (Zn, Mn and Pb) from sludge-amended soil with Brassica napus. Bioresour Technol 2010,101(11):3978-3983.
  14. Miralles P, Church TL, Harris AT. Toxicity, uptake, and translocation of engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environ Sci Technol 2012,46(17):9224-9239.
  15. Adhikari T, Kundu S, Biswas AK, Tarafdar JC, Rao AS. Effect of copper oxide nano particle on seed germination of selected crops. J Agric SciTechnol 2012,2(6A):815.
  16. Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 1981,22(5):867-880.
  17. Chance B, Maehly A. [136] Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Enzymol 1955,2:764-775.
  18. Sinha AK. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal Biochem 1972,47(2):389-394.
  19. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 1971,44(1):276-287.
  20. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976,72(1-2):248-254.
  21. Bates L, Waldren R, Teare I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973,39(1):205-207.
  22. Navarro E, Baun A, Behra R, Hartmann NB, Filser J, Miao A-J, et al. Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi. Ecotoxicol 2008,17(5):372-386.
  23. Sharma P, Bhatt D, Zaidi M, Saradhi PP, Khanna P, Arora S. Silver nanoparticle-mediated enhancement in growth and antioxidant status of Brassica juncea. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2012,167(8):2225-2233.
  24. Van Hoecke K, De Schamphelaere KA, Ramirez–Garcia S, Van der Meeren P, Smagghe G, Janssen CR. Influence of alumina coating on characteristics and effects of SiO2 nanoparticles in algal growth inhibition assays at various pH and organic matter contents. Environ Int 2011,37(6):1118-1125.
  25. Angelova V, Ivanova R, Pevicharova G, Ivanov K, editors. Effect of organic amendments on heavy metals uptake by potato plants. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World; 2010.
  26. Han D-H, Lee J-H. Effects of liming on uptake of lead and cadmium by Raphanus sativa. Arch Environ ContamToxicol 1996,31(4):488-493.
  27. Hanc A, Tlustos P, Szakova J, Habart J. Changes in cadmium mobility during composting and after soil application. Waste Manag 2009,29(8):2282-2288.
  28. Jadia CD, Fulekar MH. Phytoremediation: The application of vermicompost to remove zinc, cadmium, copper, nickel and lead by sunflower plant. Environ Eng Manag J 2008,7(5).
  29. Koukal B, Gueguen C, Pardos M, Dominik J. Influence of humic substances on the toxic effects of cadmium and zinc to the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Chemosphere 2003,53(8):953-961.
  30. Park JH, Lamb D, Paneerselvam P, Choppala G, Bolan N, Chung J-W. Role of organic amendments on enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal (loid) contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 2011,185(2):549-574.
  31. Lee S, Kim S, Kim S, Lee I. Assessment of phytotoxicity of ZnO NPs on a medicinal plant, Fagopyrum esculentum. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2013,20(2):848-854.
  32. Hong F, Zhou J, Liu C, Yang F, Wu C, Zheng L, et al. Effect of nano-TiO2 on photochemical reaction of chloroplasts of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res 2005,105(1-3):269-279.
  33. Kumari M, Khan SS, Pakrashi S, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Cytogenetic and genotoxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on root cells of Allium cepa. J Hazard Mater 2011,190(1):613-621.
  34. Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 2002,7(9):405-410.
  35. Garcí­a AC, Santos LA, Izquierdo FG, Sperandio MVL, Castro RN, Berbara RLL. Vermicompost humic acids as an ecological pathway to protect rice plant against oxidative stress. Ecol Eng 2012,47:203-208.
  36. Cordeiro FC, Santa-Catarina C, Silveira V, de SOUZA SR. Humic acid effect on catalase activity and the generation of reactive oxygen species in corn (Zea mays L.). Biosc Biotechnol Biochem 2011,75(1):70-74.
  37. Heidari M, Miri HR, Minaei A. Antioxidant enzymes activity and biochemical components of borage (Borago officinalis) in response to water stress and humic acid treatment. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences 2014,6(2):159-170.
  38. Kesba HH, El-Beltagi HS. Biochemical changes in grape rootstocks resulted from humic acid treatments in relation to nematode infection. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2012,2(4):287-293.
  39. Khan A, Khan M, Hussain F, Akhtar M, Gurmani A, Khan S. Effect of humic acid on the growth, yield, nutrient composition, photosynthetic pigment and total sugar contents of peas (Pisum sativum L.). J Chem Soc Pakistan 2013,35(1):206-211.
  40. John R, Ahmad P, Gadgil K, Sharma S. Effect of cadmium and lead on growth, biochemical parameters and uptake in Lemna polyrrhiza L. Plant Soi Environ 2008,54(6):262.
  41. Bhardwaj P, Chaturvedi AK, Prasad P. Effect of enhanced lead and cadmium in soil on physiological and biochemical attributes of Phaseolus vulgaris. J Nat Sci 2009,7(8):63-75.
  42. John R, Ahmad P, Gadgil K, Sharma S. Heavy metal toxicity: Effect on plant growth, biochemical parameters and metal accumulation by Brassica juncea L. Int J Plant Prod 2012,3(3):65-76.
  43. Prakash M, Nair G, Chung IM. Impact of copper oxide nanoparticles exposure on Arabidopsis thaliana growth, root system development, root lignification, and molecular level changes. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2014,21(22):12709.
  44. SzafraÅ„ska K, Cvikrová M, Kowalska U, Górecka K, Górecki R, Martincová O, et al. Influence of copper ions on growth, lipid peroxidation, and proline and polyamines content in carrot rosettes obtained from anther culture. Acta Physiol Plant 2011,33(3):851-859.
  45. Rao S, Shekhawat G. Toxicity of ZnO engineered nanoparticles and evaluation of their effect on growth, metabolism and tissue specific accumulation in Brassica juncea. J Environ Chem Eng 2014,2(1):105-114.
  46. Ozfidan-Konakci C, Yildiztugay E, Bahtiyar M, Kucukoduk M. The humic acid-induced changes in the water status, chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidant defense systems of wheat leaves with cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2018,155:66-75.
  47. Yildiztekin M, Tuna AL, Kaya C. Physiological effects of the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum) and humic substances on plant growth, enzyme activities of certain pepper plants grown under salt stress. Acta Biol Hung 2018,69(3):325-335.
  48. Vendruscolo ECG, Schuster I, Pileggi M, Scapim CA, Molinari HBC, Marur CJ, et al. Stress-induced synthesis of proline confers tolerance to water deficit in transgenic wheat. J Plant Physiol 2007,164(10):1367-1376.
  49. Serraj R, Sinclair T. Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions? Plan Cell Environ 2002,25(2):333-341.
  50. Siripornadulsil S, Traina S, Verma DPS, Sayre RT. Molecular mechanisms of proline-mediated tolerance to toxic heavy metals in transgenic microalgae. Plant Cell 2002,14(11):2837-2847.
  51. Hayat S, Hayat Q, Alyemeni MN, Wani AS, Pichtel J, Ahmad A. Role of proline under changing environments: a review. Plant Signal Behav 2012,7(11):1456-1466.
  52. Aydin A, Kant C, Turan M. Humic acid application alleviate salinity stress of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants decreasing membrane leakage. Afr J Agric Res 2012,7(7):1073-1086.
  53. Pizzeghello D, Francioso O, Ertani A, Muscolo A, Nardi S. Isopentenyladenosine and cytokinin-like activity of different humic substances. J Geochem Explor 2013,129:70-75.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 935 Download : 467

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.