Issue
Copyright (c) 2024 Xingyou Cai, Xin Hong, Yuli Wang, Yafei Li, Guidong Xu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The undersigned hereby assign all rights, included but not limited to copyright, for this manuscript to CMB Association upon its submission for consideration to publication on Cellular and Molecular Biology. The rights assigned include, but are not limited to, the sole and exclusive rights to license, sell, subsequently assign, derive, distribute, display and reproduce this manuscript, in whole or in part, in any format, electronic or otherwise, including those in existence at the time this agreement was signed. The authors hereby warrant that they have not granted or assigned, and shall not grant or assign, the aforementioned rights to any other person, firm, organization, or other entity. All rights are automatically restored to authors if this manuscript is not accepted for publication.Drug-coated balloon in the treatment of coronary artery de-novo large lesions angiography
Corresponding Author(s) : Guidong Xu
Cellular and Molecular Biology,
Vol. 70 No. 4: Issue 4
Abstract
The superiority of drug-coated balloon (DCB) in treating small vessels, branching lesions, and high-risk bleeding lesions in coronary heart disease patients has been confirmed. However, its safety and efficacy in large vessels are still unclear. We aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of DCB in large vessels is not inferior to that of drug-eluting stent (DES). From November 2019 to April 2022, a total of 88 patients in our hospital who underwent coronary angiography for the first time and decided to receive DCB or DES treatment were selected. Indicators including late lumen loss (LLL), major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate, major bleeding and all-cause mortality were evaluated at 9 months and 1-year post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) therapy. The primary endpoint of 9-month LLL was -0.07 in the DCB group and 0.19 mm in the DES group (p value＜0.001). 1-year cumulative MACE rates were similar in the DCB and DES groups (3.03% vs. 7.23%, P=0.519), TLR rates were similar (3.03% vs. 7.23%, P=0.519), Major bleeding was similar (3.03% vs. 5.45%, P=0.580), and 1 case of Cardiac death in DES group. For LLL, the DCB-only strategy was non-inferior to DES in treating de novo large lesions in the coronary arteries. Furthermore, the efficacy of DCB was comparable to DES at 1 year of follow-up for secondary clinical endpoints.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
